September 10, 2026 · Leadership · 4 min read
A one-on-one gives a manager and employee protected time for priorities, feedback, support and development. It becomes less useful when it is treated only as a status update or repeatedly displaced by other meetings. The exact cadence and format should fit the role, but the conversation works best when it is regular, two-way and followed by clear actions.

A useful one-on-one is a shared conversation rather than a manager’s status interrogation. The employee should have room to raise questions, blockers and development topics, while the manager still has responsibility for expectations, feedback, support and issues that cannot be left unaddressed. A shared agenda can preserve both sides of that conversation.
First five minutes: How are they actually doing, not a project update, an actual check-in.
Middle stretch: Whatever they brought, blockers, questions, ideas, concerns.
Last five minutes: Career and growth, at least once every few weeks, not every single session.
Close: One thing you’ll each follow up on before next time.
Preparation should be light, but it should exist. Review the previous action points, check whether priorities have changed and add one topic that deserves a real conversation rather than another status update.
A shared agenda reduces the risk that the manager’s topics consume the whole meeting and makes it easier to spot recurring issues over time.
Turning it into a status meeting. If you already know the project status from a dashboard, don’t spend the one-on-one re-reading it aloud.
Cancelling it when things get busy. The busiest weeks are usually exactly when people most need the check-in, cancelling then sends the opposite message.
Doing all the talking. A one-on-one where the manager does most of the talking has become a briefing, not a conversation.
Never asking about career or growth. If every single one-on-one is purely tactical, there’s no space left for the conversations that actually build a career development plan over time.
Generic questions get generic answers. “How’s it going?” tends to get “fine, thanks.” Better prompts include: “What’s the most frustrating part of your week right now?”, “What did you learn recently that you wish you’d known sooner?”, and “Is there anything I’m doing, or not doing, that’s making your job harder?” That last one takes real trust to ask sincerely, and it’s often the most useful question a manager can ask on a regular basis.
There is no universal schedule that fits every role or team. Gallup’s research on meaningful manager feedback supports frequent conversations and reports that 15- to 30-minute conversations can be enough when they happen regularly. Roles with rapid change may need shorter, more frequent contact; experienced employees in stable work may need a different rhythm. The key is that the cadence is reliable enough to address goals, priorities, feedback and support before issues accumulate.
A well-run one-on-one will occasionally surface something that needs more than a fifteen-minute conversation, a genuine performance concern, a career mismatch, or interpersonal friction with a colleague. Recognising when a routine one-on-one needs to become a more structured conversation, rather than trying to solve everything in the usual thirty-minute slot, is itself a core managerial skill.
A good conversation can still fail if nothing changes afterward. Close by recording what needs to happen next: the decision, owner and expected follow-up date. Do not turn one-on-one notes into a private transcript of everything the employee said.
If a topic involves confidential health information, a formal grievance, misconduct, discrimination or another issue with a defined organisational process, move it into the appropriate HR, legal or safeguarding route rather than leaving it inside informal meeting notes.
Video does not automatically make a one-on-one better or worse. What matters is focused attention. Close unrelated windows, avoid answering messages during the conversation and make the agenda visible to both people. When bandwidth or time zones make video impractical, a reliable audio conversation can still work if both participants can focus.
Do not let the regular one-on-one become the only place an employee hears about a serious performance concern. Routine coaching should make expectations clearer over time, while significant performance issues may need a separate, documented process with appropriate organisational guidance.
Gallup’s manager-development guidance describes a set of recurring coaching conversations rather than one annual event. It recommends quick connects for real-time feedback, regular check-ins for goals and priorities, and separate development conversations for longer-term growth. Gallup’s broader feedback research also finds that frequent meaningful manager conversations are strongly associated with employee engagement.
Effective one-on-ones are one piece of a much wider management capability. Matsh’s leadership and management programmes cover coaching conversations, feedback, and team development in depth.
We run all our courses as private programmes for organisations across the GCC and Africa.
Request In-House →