Build portfolio discipline across initiative intake, prioritisation, strategic alignment, capacity, risk, governance, investment decisions and dynamic rebalancing. Includes practical cross-functional tools and applied decision exercises.
Compare dates, venues, duration and fees. Register for your preferred session.

Project managers are usually asked whether an initiative can be delivered.
Portfolio leaders need to ask a different question first: should the organisation be doing it at all?
A portfolio can contain too many individually reasonable projects competing for the same people, budget and executive attention. Strategic priorities change but old initiatives remain funded. Projects that looked attractive independently create unacceptable combined risk. Business cases are approved using different assumptions, making comparison meaningless. Underperforming projects continue because stopping them feels politically harder than approving them did.
PMI defines portfolio management around the centralised selection, prioritisation, authorisation and control of projects, programmes and other work to achieve strategic objectives. Current 2026 portfolio-training offerings in PMI's catalogue similarly emphasise strategic alignment, risk exposure, capacity constraints and dynamic rebalancing.
This course builds that investment discipline from candidate intake through prioritisation, portfolio balance, governance, resource allocation, performance review and stop/continue decisions.
PMI Standards · PMI Enterprise Portfolio Management 2026 · PMI Portfolio Governance. Evidence is used for context, not as a guarantee of participant or organisational outcomes.
Portfolios become overloaded when:
Applications include large transformation portfolios, government modernisation, capital programmes, digital initiatives and rapidly changing strategic agendas where resource contention and executive prioritisation become critical.
Portfolio management can help development organisations, financial institutions, governments and corporates allocate scarce capital and specialist capacity across competing initiatives without importing unnecessarily complex governance.
Participants examine large technology, manufacturing and service portfolios where business units compete for investment and portfolio dependencies need to be managed at scale.
Applications include regulated transformation, sustainability investment, digital portfolios and multi-country change where portfolio governance must balance strategy, compliance, risk and capacity. These are contextual lenses, not assumptions about every organisation in a region.
Responsible for portfolio intake, prioritisation, monitoring and executive decision support.
Needing stronger portfolio-governance capability beyond PMO service design.
Moving from delivery leadership into investment and portfolio decision-making.
Connecting strategic priorities with the initiatives funded to deliver them.
Supporting capital allocation, business cases and portfolio trade-offs.
Making decisions on which initiatives start, stop, accelerate or wait.
A complete portfolio-decision framework.
Why this module matters: Portfolio governance is weak when initiatives arrive through different channels with inconsistent information and become difficult to compare. Participants learn to:
Workshop: Design an enterprise initiative-intake and classification process.
Why this module matters: A prioritisation model does not remove judgement, but it makes judgement visible. Without agreed criteria, portfolio decisions become hard to explain and easy to politicise. Participants learn to:
Simulation: Run an investment-board prioritisation session with competing initiatives.
Why this module matters: The highest-scoring projects can still create a bad portfolio if they concentrate risk or require the same scarce resources at the same time. Participants learn to:
Workshop: Rebalance an overloaded portfolio against fixed capacity.
Why this module matters: Portfolio governance has to connect project delivery information with continued investment decisions. A project that is green on schedule can still be strategically obsolete. Participants learn to:
Workshop: Review a mixed-health portfolio and make continue/pause/stop recommendations.
Why this module matters: Portfolio management is not an annual selection exercise. Strategy, markets, regulation, technology and internal capacity change continuously, so investment choices have to change too. Participants learn to:
Capstone: Present a complete portfolio operating model and rebalance a realistic portfolio against new strategic constraints.
| Format | Comprehensive modular curriculum, delivered flexibly to match programme length |
| Locations | Multiple locations, online available |
| Methodology | Prioritisation simulations, portfolio scoring, capacity scenarios, investment-board exercises and a capstone rebalancing case |
| Best for | Portfolio managers, PMO leaders, senior PMs, strategy teams, finance/investment governance and executives |
| What's Included | Intake template, scoring model, portfolio-balance matrix, capacity view, governance playbook, rebalancing checklist and certificate |
Build the discipline to select, balance and continuously rebalance the initiatives competing for your organisation's attention and capital.
We run this course as a private programme for organisations. Bespoke dates, tailored content, group pricing.
Every course starts with a needs assessment and includes structured follow-up at three points after it ends.
Have a question about this course?
Get in TouchMATSH uses Google Analytics to understand visits and improve its courses. It stays off unless you allow it. You can change your choice later.