Leadership and Strategic Management Training: What Managers Need in 2026
September 18, 2026 · Professional Development · 7 min read
Leadership development matters because managers shape the day-to-day conditions in which employees work. Gallup’s current research continues to find that managers account for about 70% of the variance in team-level employee engagement. At the same time, Gallup reports that only 44% of managers worldwide say they have received management training.
Source: Gallup — Manager Development Strategy
Source: Gallup — global management training gap reported in 2026 workplace research
The practical question is therefore not whether every manager needs the same leadership course. It is what capability the role requires now, what the manager can already do, and what kind of practice will close the gap.
Leadership development is not one curriculum
A newly promoted supervisor, a manager inheriting an established team and a senior leader making strategic decisions face different problems. Treating all three as the same “leadership” need produces broad programmes that are difficult to apply.
Start by defining the job transition or capability gap.
| Manager situation | Typical development priorities |
|---|---|
| First-time manager | Role transition, expectations, delegation, feedback, one-to-ones, basic performance conversations |
| Manager inheriting a team | Diagnosis, trust, role clarity, team operating norms, existing performance issues |
| Experienced functional manager | Cross-functional influence, decision quality, coaching, change, resource trade-offs |
| Senior or strategic leader | Strategy, uncertainty, organisational design, portfolio choices, leadership systems and succession |
What current workplace evidence says about managers
Gallup’s 2026 State of the Global Workplace reports that global employee engagement was 20% in 2025. Manager engagement fell to 22%, down from 31% in 2022. Gallup links much of the recent decline in employee engagement to declining manager engagement.
Source: Gallup — State of the Global Workplace 2026 global data
Those figures do not prove that a training course will solve engagement. They show why manager capability and manager support deserve attention. Training is one intervention alongside role design, workload, incentives, leadership expectations and the systems managers operate within.
1. First-time managers: learn the role before collecting techniques
The transition from individual contributor to manager changes the unit of work. Success is no longer only about personal output. It includes setting expectations, coordinating other people’s work, making decisions, developing capability and handling performance problems.
A useful first-time-manager programme should therefore include practice in:
- clarifying roles and outcomes;
- delegating without abandoning accountability;
- giving specific behavioural feedback;
- running useful one-to-one conversations;
- handling disagreement and underperformance;
- making workload and priority trade-offs visible.
For a focused starting point, see Supervisory Skills Development.
2. Managers inheriting a team: diagnose before changing
Taking over an existing team is different from building one. Before introducing a new structure, understand:
- what the team is accountable for;
- which work is actually critical;
- where decisions are currently made;
- which relationships or dependencies are fragile;
- what the team already does well;
- which problems are individual and which are systemic.
Development for this transition should strengthen diagnosis, listening, team norms and change sequencing rather than encouraging a new manager to prove authority through immediate restructuring.
Related option: Team Building and Team Development.
3. Experienced managers: move from supervision to organisational judgment
As scope grows, leadership becomes less about personally resolving every issue and more about designing how decisions, information and accountability move through the organisation.
Useful development areas can include:
- strategic thinking and scenario analysis;
- cross-functional influence;
- decision-making under uncertainty;
- leading organisational change;
- coaching other managers;
- resource allocation and competing priorities.
Depending on the actual gap, this can point toward Change Management for Leaders and Managers, Decisive Decision Making or a more focused specialist programme rather than another general leadership course.
4. Senior leaders: develop systems, not only personal style
Senior leadership development should not be reduced to communication style or personality. Senior leaders shape systems: structures, incentives, investment choices, talent pipelines, governance and the way trade-offs are made.
At this level, development should connect personal leadership behaviour with organisational consequences. A leader may need stronger emotional self-management, but also better strategy processes, succession planning or decision governance.
The GCC context: nationalisation makes leadership pipelines operationally important
Leadership development in the GCC sits alongside active labour-market nationalisation policies. This does not mean every organisation faces the same target or should promote people before they are ready. It does mean workforce and leadership-pipeline planning should account for current localisation requirements.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development announced a new phase of the Nitaqat Mutawar programme beginning in 2026 and spanning three years. The ministry says the phase is intended to localise more than 340,000 additional private-sector jobs for Saudi men and women.
Source: Saudi Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development — new Nitaqat Mutawar phase
For employers, one implication is that talent development should be connected to workforce planning rather than treated as a separate annual training calendar.
United Arab Emirates
UAE MoHRE states that private-sector companies with 50 or more employees are required to achieve a 1% semi-annual growth in Emiratisation in skilled jobs, contributing to the 2026 target trajectory.
Source: UAE Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation — 2026 Emiratisation target reminder
Exact requirements depend on establishment size, activity and the applicable rules. Organisations should verify current official requirements rather than relying on a leadership-training article for compliance advice.
Diagnose the leadership work before selecting the course
The most common mistake in leadership development is choosing a level label before defining the work. “Emerging leader,” “middle manager” and “senior leader” can describe very different responsibilities across organisations. A better brief starts with the decisions the person must make and the relationships they must manage.
Feedback, delegation, conflict
Priorities, execution, trade-offs
Direction, adoption, uncertainty
Strategy, governance, resources
For first-time managers, the diagnostic usually reveals immediate people-management work. Experienced managers may need stronger cross-functional judgement or the ability to lead through other managers. Senior leaders may need to make enterprise trade-offs, sponsor change and create systems rather than personally solve every problem.
Once the work is clear, the programme should reproduce it. If the role requires difficult feedback, participants should practise difficult feedback. If it requires portfolio trade-offs, the course should use competing priorities and incomplete information. If it requires strategic communication, participants should be forced to simplify a complex message for different audiences.
This also gives organisations a more useful evaluation method. Rather than asking whether participants enjoyed the programme, managers can observe whether the targeted leadership behaviours are appearing in real work and whether organisational barriers are preventing application.
How to choose leadership training
Do not start with a course title. Start with evidence about the role.
- Define the transition. Is the person moving into management, inheriting a team, leading managers or taking strategic responsibility?
- Identify observable gaps. “Needs leadership” is too vague. Specify delegation, feedback, decision quality, stakeholder management, strategy or another capability.
- Choose practice, not only content. Look for cases, simulations, feedback and application to real work.
- Plan transfer. Decide what the participant will apply after the programme and who will support that application.
- Review outcomes. Check behaviour and work outcomes rather than treating attendance as proof of capability.
Course pathways by need
| Need | Relevant MATSH pathway |
|---|---|
| First supervisory role | Supervisory Skills Development |
| Team diagnosis and development | Team Building and Team Development |
| Leading change | Change Management for Leaders and Managers |
| Decision quality | Decisive Decision Making |
| Emotional intelligence as a specific leadership capability | Emotional Intelligence for Leaders |
| Women navigating leadership development | Women in Leadership |
These are different learning paths, not a ranking. The appropriate choice depends on the role and capability gap.
What this article no longer claims
The previous version relied on a training-provider article for claims that new managers wait an average of 4.2 years for training, that roughly 60% fail within 24 months and that poor management causes close to half of voluntary turnover. Those claims were not supported here by a traceable primary source, so they have been removed.
The previous GCC section also used an unsupported “well over half under 35” workforce claim and broad cultural generalisations. The revised regional section uses current Saudi and UAE government policy instead.
Sources
Need In-House Training?
We run all our courses as private programmes for organisations across the GCC and Africa.
Request In-House →