November 10, 2026 · Youth Development · 3 min read
Memoranda of understanding and advisory boards are easy to count. The harder question is whether employers are contributing real labour-market information, work-based learning, instructor exposure, equipment relevance, assessment standards and hiring feedback. Strong partnerships create an operating loop between training provision and the world of work.
The ILO’s work on TVET governance emphasises employer participation in policy, financing, apprenticeships, management, delivery and assessment. Recent UNESCO work in Jordan similarly focuses on strengthening private-sector engagement and work-based learning to improve the link between vocational education and employers.
Source: ILO, Employer Organizations in TVET Governance · Source: UNESCO, Private Sector Engagement and WBL in Jordan
Current and emerging occupations, tasks and skills.
Competencies and practical standards aligned with work.
Structured exposure to real workplaces.
Keeping trainers current with industry practice.
Placement, feedback and hiring pathways.
Not every employer needs to do everything. Some can provide demand data, some work placements, some assessment expertise, some equipment or instructor exposure, and some direct hiring.
| Employer input | Training-system decision |
|---|---|
| Critical tasks | Competency standards |
| Technology changes | Curriculum update / equipment needs |
| Entry-level failure points | Assessment and practical preparation |
| Future occupation demand | Programme portfolio decisions |
Employer feedback such as “communication” or “digital skills” is too broad unless converted into workplace behaviours. Ask what competent performance looks like in real tasks.
ILO work on strengthening work-based learning in VET institutions emphasises the role of local industry and social partners. Practical experience should not be an optional add-on after classroom training.
Source: ILO, Strengthening Work-Based Learning in VET Institutions
| Weak placement | Structured WBL |
|---|---|
| Observation only | Defined tasks and learning outcomes |
| No supervisor role | Named workplace trainer/supervisor |
| No assessment | Evidence against competency standards |
| Unrelated work | Work aligned with programme outcomes |
Industry attachment, co-teaching, technical updating and employer-led demonstrations can help instructors stay current. The objective is not to outsource teaching to employers but to keep institutional capability aligned with practice.
ILO TVET–industry work has highlighted bottlenecks in data exchange and the importance of tracer studies, skills anticipation and quality assurance. Establish a predictable flow of information rather than relying on informal conversations.
Track who is placed, where, at what occupation level, how long they remain and what employers report about performance. Feed this evidence into programme review.
| Governance element | Question |
|---|---|
| Decision rights | What can employers influence? |
| Representation | Are relevant sectors and firm sizes represented? |
| Cadence | How often is labour-market evidence reviewed? |
| Accountability | Who acts on agreed changes? |
| Conflict of interest | How are individual employer interests balanced with system needs? |
Employer collaboration can identify where women, youth with disabilities or other groups face barriers in recruitment, workplace learning or retention. Incorporate these findings into programme design and workplace preparation.
MATSH’s TVET Programme Design and Industry Partnerships Course helps training institutions, ministries and workforce organisations design governance, competency standards, industry engagement, work-based learning and employment feedback systems.
We run all our courses as private programmes for organisations across the GCC and Africa.
Request In-House →MATSH uses Google Analytics to improve courses. Optional analytics cookies stay off unless you allow them; limited cookieless measurement may occur. You can change your choice later.