{"id":10438,"date":"2026-10-01T15:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-01T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/?p=10438"},"modified":"2026-09-27T17:31:35","modified_gmt":"2026-09-27T13:31:35","slug":"business-continuity-statistics-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/business-continuity-statistics-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Business Continuity Statistics 2026: Cyber, Disruption and Resilience Risk"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.ms-section{border-left:4px solid #c0561b;padding-left:14px;margin:42px 0 18px;font-size:1.35rem;color:#3d2408}\n.ms-hook{background:#fdf5ee;border:1.5px solid #ecd0a8;border-radius:16px;padding:30px 32px;margin-bottom:28px}.ms-hook h2{margin:0 0 12px;color:#3d2408;font-size:1.38rem}.ms-hook p{margin:0;color:#4a3a2e;line-height:1.8}\n.ms-note{background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #122f42;padding:18px 22px;margin:22px 0;color:#3a4a5e;line-height:1.7}\n.ms-stats{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(175px,1fr));gap:14px;margin:26px 0 34px}.ms-stat{border:1.5px solid #ecd0a8;border-radius:13px;padding:20px;background:#fff;text-align:center}.ms-stat strong{display:block;font-size:1.55rem;color:#c0561b;line-height:1.15}.ms-stat span{display:block;margin-top:7px;color:#596579;font-size:.8rem;line-height:1.5}\n.ms-table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:22px 0 32px;font-size:.9rem}.ms-table th{background:#3d2408;color:#fff;text-align:left;padding:13px 14px}.ms-table td{border:1px solid #ead8c4;padding:13px 14px;vertical-align:top;line-height:1.6}.ms-table tr:nth-child(even) td{background:#fffaf6}\n.ms-bar-wrap{border:1.5px solid #ecd0a8;border-radius:14px;padding:24px 26px;margin:26px 0;background:#fff}.ms-bar-row{display:grid;grid-template-columns:175px 1fr 70px;gap:12px;align-items:center;margin:12px 0;font-size:.86rem}.ms-bar{height:14px;background:#f1e1d2;border-radius:20px;overflow:hidden}.ms-fill{height:100%;background:#c0561b;border-radius:20px}\n.ms-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(220px,1fr));gap:14px;margin:22px 0 30px}.ms-card{border:1.5px solid #dde3ec;border-radius:12px;padding:20px;background:#fff}.ms-card strong{display:block;color:#122f42;margin-bottom:7px}.ms-card p{margin:0;color:#4a5568;font-size:.9rem;line-height:1.7}\n.ms-insight{background:#fdf5ee;border-radius:12px;padding:20px 24px;margin:18px 0;color:#3d2408;line-height:1.7}\n.ms-artifact{border:2px dashed #ecd0a8;border-radius:12px;padding:22px 26px;margin:24px 0}.ms-artifact h4{margin:0 0 10px;color:#3d2408}.ms-artifact ul{margin:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3a4a5e;line-height:1.9}\n.ms-related{background:#f8fafc;border:1.5px solid #dde3ec;border-radius:14px;padding:28px 30px;margin:34px 0}.ms-related h3{margin:0 0 16px;color:#122f42}.ms-related-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(230px,1fr));gap:12px}.ms-related a{background:#fff;border:1px solid #dde3ec;border-radius:10px;padding:14px 16px;text-decoration:none;color:#122f42;display:block}.ms-related span{display:block;color:#6b7a99;font-size:.8rem;margin-top:4px}\n.ms-cta{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#c0561b,#3d2408);border-radius:16px;padding:36px 38px;margin:36px 0;color:#fff}.ms-cta h3{color:#fff;margin:0 0 10px}.ms-cta p{margin:0 0 20px;opacity:.92;line-height:1.7}.ms-cta a{display:inline-block;background:rgba(255,255,255,.16);border:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.35);border-radius:8px;padding:10px 16px;margin:5px 7px 0 0;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;font-size:.86rem}\n<\/style>\n<div class=\"ms-hook\">\n<h2>Business continuity in 2026 is being shaped by interconnected digital, supply-chain, geopolitical and climate risks<\/h2>\n<p>A useful continuity statistics page should not pretend that one percentage predicts whether a company will survive a crisis. The strongest current evidence instead shows which disruptions risk professionals are most concerned about, how those risks interact and where organisations perceive their resilience to be weak.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\" style=\"margin:26px 0 34px\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Business-continuity-risk-statistics-dashboard-photo-by-Luke-Chesser-on-Unsplash.jpg\" alt=\"Analytics dashboard representing business continuity and operational risk statistics\"\/><figcaption style=\"font-size:.75rem;color:#6b7a99\">Photo by <a href=\"https:\/\/unsplash.com\/@lukechesser?utm_source=wpvibe&#038;utm_medium=referral\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Luke Chesser<\/a> on Unsplash.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"ms-note\"><strong>How to read these numbers:<\/strong> Allianz&#8217;s 2026 Risk Barometer is a perception survey of 3,338 risk-management experts from 97 countries and territories. The percentages below show how often respondents selected a risk among their top corporate concerns. They are not probabilities that the event will happen to a particular company.<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-stats\">\n<div class=\"ms-stat\"><strong>42%<\/strong><span>selected cyber incidents as a top global business risk for 2026<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-stat\"><strong>32%<\/strong><span>selected artificial intelligence risk, up sharply in the 2026 ranking<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-stat\"><strong>29%<\/strong><span>selected business interruption, including supply-chain disruption<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-stat\"><strong>26%<\/strong><span>selected changes in legislation and regulation<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-stat\"><strong>21%<\/strong><span>selected natural catastrophes among their leading risks<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-stat\"><strong>3%<\/strong><span>of 970 respondents to a supply-chain resilience question viewed their supply chains as very resilient<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commercial.allianz.com\/news-and-insights\/reports\/allianz-risk-barometer.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source: Allianz Risk Barometer 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Cyber remains the highest-ranked corporate concern<\/h2>\n<p>Cyber incidents ranked first globally in the Allianz Risk Barometer for the fifth consecutive year, selected by <strong>42% of respondents<\/strong>. Allianz reports that cyber was also the top-ranked concern across company sizes and across every major region covered by the survey, including Africa and the Middle East.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commercial.allianz.com\/news-and-insights\/expert-risk-articles\/allianz-risk-barometer-2026-cyber-incidents.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source: Allianz Commercial, Cyber incidents, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-insight\"><strong>Continuity implication:<\/strong> Cyber resilience is not only an information-security issue. A major cyber incident can remove access to core systems, communications, data and third-party services, turning a security event into a business-continuity event within minutes.<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Business interruption remains a top-three global risk<\/h2>\n<p>Business interruption, including supply-chain disruption, ranked third globally in 2026 and was selected by <strong>29% of respondents<\/strong>. Allianz notes that business interruption had ranked either first or second in every edition of the Risk Barometer for the previous 15 years before moving to third in 2026.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commercial.allianz.com\/news-and-insights\/expert-risk-articles\/allianz-risk-barometer-2026-business-interruption.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source: Allianz Commercial, Business interruption, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-bar-wrap\">\n<strong style=\"color:#3d2408\">Selected global business risks in Allianz Risk Barometer 2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-bar-row\"><span>Cyber incidents<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-bar\">\n<div class=\"ms-fill\" style=\"width:42%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>42%<\/strong><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-bar-row\"><span>Artificial intelligence<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-bar\">\n<div class=\"ms-fill\" style=\"width:32%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>32%<\/strong><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-bar-row\"><span>Business interruption<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-bar\">\n<div class=\"ms-fill\" style=\"width:29%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>29%<\/strong><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-bar-row\"><span>Regulation \/ legislation<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-bar\">\n<div class=\"ms-fill\" style=\"width:26%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>26%<\/strong><\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-bar-row\"><span>Natural catastrophes<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-bar\">\n<div class=\"ms-fill\" style=\"width:21%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>21%<\/strong><\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:14px 0 0;color:#6b7a99;font-size:.78rem\">Percentages are respondent selections, not mutually exclusive shares and not event probabilities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Supply-chain confidence is weak in the 2026 survey<\/h2>\n<p>In a separate Allianz Risk Barometer question on supply-chain resilience, only <strong>3% of 970 respondents<\/strong> described their supply chains as \u201cvery resilient\u201d to disruptions caused by geopolitical conflict, changing trade patterns or critical-infrastructure failures.<\/p>\n<p>That figure should be interpreted narrowly. It does not mean 97% of global supply chains will fail. It shows that very few respondents were willing to place their supply chains in the highest resilience category against the specified disruption types.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-grid\">\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Supplier concentration<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A critical input may have several named suppliers but still depend on one country, port, cloud platform or upstream manufacturer.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Long recovery chains<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An organisation may restore its own operations before a critical vendor, logistics route or infrastructure provider recovers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Digital dependencies<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Third-party technology can create business interruption even when the organisation&#8217;s own network remains available.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Geopolitical exposure<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Trade restrictions, conflict, sanctions and transport disruption can affect availability without damaging any company-owned asset.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Artificial intelligence jumped to the number-two risk<\/h2>\n<p>AI was selected by <strong>32% of Allianz respondents<\/strong> and rose from tenth place in the previous year&#8217;s ranking to second in 2026. The report groups concerns including implementation problems, liability and misinformation\/disinformation.<\/p>\n<p>The continuity angle is operational dependency. As organisations embed AI into core workflows, they need to know which services can continue if a model, provider, integration or data pipeline is unavailable or unreliable.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Regulatory change is also a continuity concern<\/h2>\n<p>Changes in legislation and regulation ranked fourth globally at <strong>26%<\/strong>. A regulatory event may not look like a traditional crisis, but new tariffs, sanctions, data restrictions, safety requirements or operating rules can make a previously viable process impossible or non-compliant.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-insight\"><strong>Continuity implication:<\/strong> A mature plan considers loss of permission as well as loss of infrastructure. Ask what happens if a supplier, market, data transfer, transport route or product can no longer be used under existing rules.<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Natural catastrophes remain a major operational threat<\/h2>\n<p>Natural catastrophes ranked fifth globally, selected by <strong>21% of respondents<\/strong>. Allianz reported that insured natural-catastrophe losses for 2025 were expected to reach approximately US$107 billion, citing Swiss Re, with economic losses above US$200 billion.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commercial.allianz.com\/news-and-insights\/expert-risk-articles\/allianz-risk-barometer-2026-natural-catastrophes.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source: Allianz Commercial, Natural catastrophes, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Those are global loss estimates, not a forecast of what one organisation will lose. For continuity planning, the practical question is which facilities, infrastructure, people, transport routes and suppliers are exposed to weather and catastrophe risk, and whether the recovery strategy is independent of the same hazard.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">The 2026 geopolitical risk outlook adds another layer<\/h2>\n<p>The World Economic Forum&#8217;s <em>Global Risks Report 2026<\/em> found geoeconomic confrontation was the most frequently selected top risk for 2026 in its Global Risks Perception Survey, chosen by <strong>18% of respondents<\/strong>, followed by state-based armed conflict at <strong>14%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.weforum.org\/publications\/global-risks-report-2026\/in-full\/global-risks-report-2026-chapter-1\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source: World Economic Forum, Global Risks Report 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<p>These are global risk-perception results, not business-interruption rates. They matter because geopolitical disruption can transmit into operations through trade restrictions, energy, logistics, currencies, suppliers, cyber activity and workforce mobility.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">What these statistics should change in a continuity plan<\/h2>\n<table class=\"ms-table\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Evidence<\/th>\n<th>Planning question<\/th>\n<th>Useful exercise<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Cyber: 42%<\/td>\n<td>Can critical services operate if core systems or shared files are unavailable?<\/td>\n<td>Ransomware plus communications outage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AI: 32%<\/td>\n<td>Which critical decisions or workflows now depend on an AI model or vendor?<\/td>\n<td>AI service failure or unsafe output scenario<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Business interruption: 29%<\/td>\n<td>Which dependencies would stop delivery even if the organisation itself remains intact?<\/td>\n<td>Multi-supplier and logistics disruption<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Regulatory change: 26%<\/td>\n<td>What if a market, supplier or operating process becomes restricted?<\/td>\n<td>Sudden sanctions, tariff or compliance change<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Natural catastrophes: 21%<\/td>\n<td>Are primary and backup facilities exposed to the same hazard?<\/td>\n<td>Regional flood, storm, heat or infrastructure outage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Business continuity is broader than disaster recovery<\/h2>\n<p>IT disaster recovery is important, but Ready.gov explicitly positions technology recovery alongside business continuity rather than as a substitute for it. Recovery strategies need to cover people, facilities, suppliers, communications and decision-making as well as systems and data.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-artifact\">\n<h4>Evidence-based questions for a 2026 continuity review<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Which critical services cannot function without digital platforms or third-party technology?<\/li>\n<li>Which AI-enabled processes need a manual fallback or human override?<\/li>\n<li>Which suppliers share a hidden common dependency?<\/li>\n<li>Which regulatory or geopolitical changes could remove access to a market or input?<\/li>\n<li>Are backup facilities, suppliers and data copies exposed to the same physical hazard?<\/li>\n<li>Can leaders activate the plan if normal communications are unavailable?<\/li>\n<li>Have recovery targets been demonstrated in an exercise rather than accepted on paper?<\/li>\n<li>Does each major exercise finding have an owner and closure date?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">ISO 22301 remains the reference framework while revision is underway<\/h2>\n<p>As of 2026, ISO 22301:2019 remains the published international standard for business continuity management systems, with its 2024 climate-action amendment. ISO is developing a third edition, but the committee draft is not yet the published replacement. Organisations should therefore distinguish the current standard from the revision work underway.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Risk rankings should drive scenarios, not generic fear<\/h2>\n<p>A risk survey becomes operationally useful when it changes what the organisation rehearses. The Allianz results point to combinations rather than isolated events: a cyber incident that interrupts operations, an AI dependency that fails during a customer-service surge, a regulatory change that removes a supplier, or a natural catastrophe that also affects transport and telecommunications.<\/p>\n<table class=\"ms-table\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>2026 risk signal<\/th>\n<th>Useful continuity scenario<\/th>\n<th>Capability to test<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Cyber incidents<\/td>\n<td>Ransomware removes access to core systems and shared files<\/td>\n<td>Manual operations, data restoration, decision authority, communications<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AI risk<\/td>\n<td>Critical AI service becomes unavailable or produces unsafe output<\/td>\n<td>Human override, manual fallback, vendor dependency, quality controls<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Business interruption<\/td>\n<td>Major supplier and transport route fail together<\/td>\n<td>Alternate sourcing, inventory priorities, customer commitments<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Regulatory change<\/td>\n<td>New rule immediately restricts a product, country or data transfer<\/td>\n<td>Legal escalation, alternate process, customer communication<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Natural catastrophe<\/td>\n<td>Regional event affects office, staff transport, utilities and backup site<\/td>\n<td>Geographic redundancy and remote operating capability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Use external statistics with internal resilience measures<\/h2>\n<p>External risk rankings tell you what other organisations are worried about. They do not tell you whether your own organisation can recover. Pair them with internal evidence.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ms-grid\">\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Exercise completion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How many critical services have been tested against a realistic scenario in the last 12 months?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Recovery performance<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>During tests, how often did actual recovery meet the agreed RTO and RPO?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Dependency coverage<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How many critical suppliers and technology services have a validated fallback?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Finding closure<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How many exercise or incident findings remain open beyond their agreed due date?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Manual fallback<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Which critical services can continue at a minimum acceptable level without their primary system?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-card\"><strong>Decision readiness<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Can deputies activate continuity arrangements if primary leaders are unavailable?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-related\">\n<h3>Build the crisis-management cluster<\/h3>\n<div class=\"ms-related-grid\">\n<a href=\"\/en\/business-continuity-plan-guide\/\"><strong>Business Continuity Plan Guide<\/strong><span>Build the BIA, recovery strategy, command structure and tabletop exercise step by step.<\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"\/en\/strategies-for-effective-crisis-management-in-mena-family-businesses\/\"><strong>Crisis Management for MENA Family Businesses<\/strong><span>Governance, leadership transition and continuity in family enterprises.<\/span><\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"\/en\/strategies-for-managing-supply-chain-disruptions-in-african-logistics\/\"><strong>Supply Chain Resilience in Africa<\/strong><span>Practical preparation for logistics and supplier disruption.<\/span><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ms-cta\">\n<h3>Turn risk awareness into tested continuity capability<\/h3>\n<p>MATSH&#8217;s Crisis Management and Business Continuity Course connects business impact analysis, recovery planning, crisis leadership, communications and scenario exercises so the plan is usable under pressure.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/en\/course\/crisis-management-business-continuity-course\/\">Explore the Crisis Management course<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"\/en\/register\/?course=Crisis+Management\">Register<\/a>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"ms-section\">Sources<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/commercial.allianz.com\/news-and-insights\/reports\/allianz-risk-barometer.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Allianz Risk Barometer 2026<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/commercial.allianz.com\/news-and-insights\/expert-risk-articles\/allianz-risk-barometer-2026-business-interruption.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Allianz Commercial, Business interruption 2026<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/commercial.allianz.com\/news-and-insights\/expert-risk-articles\/allianz-risk-barometer-2026-cyber-incidents.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Allianz Commercial, Cyber incidents 2026<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.weforum.org\/publications\/global-risks-report-2026\/in-full\/global-risks-report-2026-chapter-1\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">World Economic Forum, Global Risks Report 2026<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/75106.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ISO 22301:2019<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Verified 2026 business continuity statistics on cyber incidents, business interruption, AI, supply-chain resilience, regulation, natural catastrophes and geopolitical risk.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10440,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[404,263],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-professional-development","category-research"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10438"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10438\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10454,"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10438\/revisions\/10454"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10440"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matsh.co\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}